Document Type : Original Article


Senior Lecturer, University Utara Malaysia, Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia


typical classroom is full of diverse students and not all students are identical in their academic abilities. Students need a variety of options to assimilate information and beget meaning. Differentiated instruction is being widely used in such diverse classrooms as a method which advocates adaptation of instructional practices commensurate with the diverse needs of students. However, when it comes to assessment, teachers are still contingent upon uniform assessment methods for all students in the classroom irrespective of their diverse learning abilities. The assessment practices that overlook the background knowledge of diverse student population are unfair. Varying learning abilities of student’s call for a differentiated method of assessment in the classrooms that ensures that correct assessment of learning is actualized and the report accurately informs teachers what accommodations are to be made in their instructional practices to meet individual need of students. This article attempts to establish that differentiated assessment can be carried out by either lowering the expectations for students with lower ability or by being flexible with assessment methods according to students wants to accurately measure learning. Only when differentiated instructional practices are informed by differentiated assessment practices can a teacher ensure that learning needs of every student in a classroom is met.


Anderson, K. M., (2007). Differentiating instruction to include all students. Preventing School Failure, 51(3), 49–54.
Black, P., & William, D. (2003). In praise of educational research: Formative assessment. British Educational Research Journal, 29(5), 623-637.
Black, P. J. (1998). Testing: friend or foe? The theory and practice of assessment and testing. London: Flamer Press.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2001). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. [Online] Retrieved from Website:
Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B. & William, D. (2004). Assessment for Learning: Putting it into practice. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
Bloom, B. S., Hastings, J. T. &Madaus, G. F. (1971). Handbook on formative and summative evaluation of student learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Burns, M. K., Codding, R. S., Boice, C. H., &Lukito, G. (2010). Meta-Analysis of acquisition and fluency math interventions with instructional and frustration level skills: Evidence for a skill-by-treatment interaction. School Psychology Review, 39, 69– 83.
Bursuck, W. D., Munk, D. D., & Olson, M. M. (1999). The fairness of report card grading adaptations: What do students with and without disabilities think? Remedial and Special Education, 20, 84–92.
Chiu, D. W. T., & Pearson, P. D. (1999). Synthesizing the effects of test accommodations for special education and limited English proficient students. Paper presented at the National Conference on Large-Scale Assessment, Snowbird, UT. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED433362)
Clarke, M., Madaus, G. F., Horn, C. J., & Ramos, M. A. (2000). Retrospective on educational testing and assessment in the 20th century. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(2), 159–181.
Dietel, R. J., Herman, J. L., & Knuth, R. A. (1991). What does research say about assessment? [Online]. Retrieved from
Earl, L (2003). Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximize student learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Epstein, J. L. (1987). Toward a theory of family-school connections: Teacher practices and parent involvement across the school years. In K. Hurrelmann, F. Kaufmann, and F. Losel (Eds.). Social Intervention: Potential and constraints. New York: deGruyter.
Epstein, J. L. (1996). Family-school links: How do they affect educational outcomes? In A. Booth and J. Dunn (Eds.), Family-School Links: How do they affect educational outcomes? Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., & Hoffman, M. B. (1979). The dynamic assessment of retarded performers: The learning potential assessment device: Theory, instruments, and techniques. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
Fogarty, R., & Pete, B. M. (2010). Supporting differentiated instruction: A professional learning communities approach. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
Gable, R. A., Hendrickson, J. M., Tonelson, S. W., & Van Acker, R. (2000). Changing disciplinary and instructional practices in the middle school to address IDEA. The Clearing House, 73(4), 205-208.
Gittman, E., & Koster, E. (1999). Analysis of ability and achievement scores for students recommended by classroom teachers to a gifted and talented program. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Northeastern Educational Research Association, Ellenville, NY.
Gottlieb, M. (2006). Assessing English language learners: Bridges from language proficiency to academic achievement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Guild, P. B. (2001). Diversity, Learning Style and Culture. New Horizons for Learning. Retrieved from, [24 August 2014].
Hall, T. (2002). Differentiated instruction [Online]. Wakefield, MA: CAST. Retrieved from
Harris Stefanakis, E. (1998). Whose judgment counts?: Assessing bilingual children, K-3. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Harris Stefanakis, E. (2010). Differentiated Assessment: Finding Every Learner’s Potential. San Francisco: Wiley, Jossey Bass Publishers.
Helwig, R., & Tindal, G. (2003). An experimental analysis of accommodation decisions on large-scale mathematics tests. Exceptional Children, 69(2), 211-225.
Hoge, R. D. (1984). Psychometric properties of teacher-judgment measures of pupil attitudes, classroom behaviors, and achievement levels. Journal of Special Education, 17, 401–429.
Johnsen, S. (2003). Adapting instruction with heterogeneous groups. Gifted Child Today, 26(3), 5-6.
Johnstone, C. J., Altman, L., Thurlow, M., & Thompson, S. (2006). A summary of research on the effects of test accommodations: 2002 through 2004 (Technical Report 45). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. 
Jung, L. A., & Guskey, T. R. (2010). Grading Exceptional Learners: Meeting students where they are. Educational Leadership, 16(5), 31-35.
Kingore, B. (2004). Differentiation: Simplified, Realistic, and Effective. Austin: Professional Associates Publishing.
Koenig, J.A., & Bachman, L.F. (Eds.). (2004). keeping score for all: The effects of inclusion and accommodation policies on large-scale educational assessments. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Marzano, R. J. (2000). Transforming classroom grading. Alexandria, VA: McREL
McBride, B. (2004). Data-driven instructional methods: "One-strategy-fits-all" doesn't work in real classrooms. T.H.E Journal, 31(11), 38-40.
McKevitt, B. C., & Elliott, S. N. (2001). The effects and consequences of using testing accommodations on a standardized reading test. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin.
McNair, S., Bhargava, A., Adams, L., Edgerton, S. &Kypos, B. (2003). Teachers speak out on assessment practices. Early Childhood Education Journal, 31(1), 23–31.
Naqvi, R. (2009). Building bridges: Acknowledging children’s first languages. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA, April.
Nolet, V., & McLaughlin, M. J. (2000). Accessing the general curriculum: Including students with disabilities in standards-based reform. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. 
Patricia, C. K. & Steadman, M. H. (1996). Classroom Research: Implementing the Scholarship of Teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Pellegrino, J. W., Chudowsky, N. & Glaser, R. (Eds.) (2001). Knowing what students know: the science and design of educational assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Popham, W. J. (2001). The Truth about testing: An educator’s call to action. Alexandria, Va.  Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Race, P. Brown, S. & Smith, B. (2005). 500 Tips on assessment: 2nd edition. London: Routledge.
Rock, M., Gregg, M., Ellis, E., & Gable, R. A. (2008). REACH: A framework for differentiating classroom instruction. Preventing School Failure, 52(2), 31–47.
Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119–144.
Sharpley, C. F., & Edgar, E. (1986). Teachers’ ratings vs. standardized tests: an empirical investigation of agreement between two indices of achievement. Psychology in the Schools, 23, 106–111.
Shepard, L., Hammerness, K., Darling-Hammond, L., Rust, F., Snowden, J. B., Gordon, E., Gutierrez, C., & Pacheco, J. (2005). Assessment. Chapter 8 in Darling-Hammond, L. & Bransford, J. (Eds) Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should know and be able to do. San  Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass (note particularly pp. 282-284).
Silva, M., Munk, D. D., &Bursuck, W. D. (2005). Grading adaptations for students with disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 41, 87–98.
Sizer, T. R. (1999). No two are quite alike. Educational Leadership, 57(1), 6-11.
Stefanakis, E. H., & Meier, D. (2010). Differentiated assessment: How to assess the learning potential of every student (grades 6–12). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Stiggins, R. J. (2002). Assessment crisis: The absence of assessment for learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(10), 758–765.
Tatum, A.W. (2011). Diversity and literacy. In S.J. Samuels &A.E. Farstrup (Eds.), what research has to say about reading instruction (4th ed., pp. 424-447). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Tindal, G., & Fuchs, L. (1999). A summary of research on testing accommodations: What we know so far. Lexington, KY: Mid-South Regional Resource Center.
Tindal, G., & Fuchs, L. (2000). A summary of research on test changes: An empirical basis for defining accommodations. Lexington, KY: Mid-South Regional Resource Center.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2002). Different learner’s different lessons. Instructor, 112(2), 21-25.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2004). Point/counterpoint: Sharing responsibility for differentiating instruction. Roeper Review, 26(4), 188-189.
Uchiyama, M. K. (2004). Teachers’ use of formative assessment in middle school reform-based mathematics classrooms. Digital Dissertations (UMI No.AAT 3123299).
Vaughn. S., Schumm. J. S., Niarhos, F. J., & Gordon, J. (1993). Students' perceptions of two hypothetical teachers' instructional adaptations for low achievers. The Elementary School Journal, 94(1). 87- 102.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. (pp. 79-91). In Mind in Society. (Trans. M. Cole). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wilson, R. J. (1996). Assessing students in classrooms and schools. Scarborough, ON: Allyn and Bacon.
Ysseldyke, J., Nelson, J. R., Christenson, S., Johnson, D. R., Dennison, A., Triezenberg, H., Sharpe, M., & Hawes, M. (2004). What we know and need to know about the consequences of high-stakes testing for students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 71(1), 75-95.
Zigmond, N., & Thornton, H. (1985). Follow-up of postsecondary age learning disabled graduates and dropouts. Learning Disabilities Research, 1(1), 50-55.