The Effectiveness of a Multi-Session Motivational Interviewing (MI-Supportive) Intervention Combined with Digital Follow-Up (EMA/SMS) in Reducing Marijuana Use and Enhancing Motivation to Change among Clinical Adolescents: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Authors

    Elham Dehghan MSc, Department of Clinical Psychology, Sha.C., Islamic Azad University, Shahrood, Iran
    Fatemeh Mofakhami * MA, Department of General Psychology, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran. mofakhamifa@gmail.com
    Saba Rabiee MSc, Department of Medical Genetics and Genomics, College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences university of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland.
    Leila Esmaeilzadeh MSc, Department of Clinical Psychology, Za.C., Islamic Azad University, Zanjan, Iran
    Abdollah Saadati MA, Department of Psychology, Qo.C., Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran

Keywords:

 motivational interviewing, ecological momentary assessment, SMS, randomized controlled trial, adolescents, cannabis

Abstract

Purpose: This study presents a randomized controlled trial examining the effectiveness of a multi‑session Motivational Interviewing (MI‑Supportive) intervention augmented with ecological momentary assessment (EMA) and adaptive SMS follow‑up (MI + EMA/SMS) compared with an active supportive counseling control in reducing marijuana use and enhancing motivation to change among clinical adolescents.

Methods and Materials: Adolescents (N = 240; ages 13–18) referred from outpatient and inpatient adolescent clinical services were randomized 1:1 to receive either four manualized MI sessions (45–60 minutes each) with EMA/SMS digital follow‑up or an active, time‑matched supportive counseling control with non‑adaptive digital contact. Primary outcome was days of cannabis use in the past 30 days assessed via Timeline Followback at baseline, post‑intervention (8 weeks), 3‑month, and 6‑month follow‑up. Secondary outcomes included motivation to change (Readiness Ruler, URICA), cannabis‑related problems (CUDIT‑R), craving, and urine drug screen (UDS) results. EMA captured momentary motivation, craving, and contextual risk, and triggered adaptive SMS messages in the experimental arm. Analyses used intent‑to‑treat mixed‑effects models with multiple imputation for missing data.

Findings: Compared with the active control, the MI + EMA/SMS arm demonstrated greater reductions in days of cannabis use across follow‑up (adjusted mean difference at 6 months = −3.9 days, 95% CI −5.6 to −2.2; Cohen’s d ≈ 0.42, p < .001). Secondary outcomes favored the experimental arm, with larger increases in readiness to change, greater reductions in CUDIT‑R scores, lower proportion of UDS‑positive participants at 6 months (31% vs. 46%), and modest improvements in craving and depressive symptoms. Mediation analyses suggested that increases in EMA‑measured momentary motivation and reductions in craving partially mediated the intervention effect. EMA adherence averaged 72%.

Conclusion: In this trial, integrating multi‑session MI with EMA‑triggered supportive SMS yielded clinically meaningful reductions in adolescent cannabis use and increased motivation to change relative to an active control. These findings support the potential of hybrid, just‑in‑time interventions that combine high‑fidelity psychotherapy with adaptive digital support for adolescent substance use treatment. Future empirical trials are needed to replicate these results, evaluate long‑term durability, and assess cost‑effectiveness and equitable implementation.

 

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

American Psychiatric, A. (2022). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. American Psychiatric Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425787

Baker, A. (2009). Motivational Interviewing in the Treatment of Psychological Problems. Drug and Alcohol Review, 28(6), 696-696. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3362.2009.00129_6.x

Barnett, E., Sussman, S., Smith, C., Rohrbach, L. A., & Spruijt-Metz, D. (2019). Motivational interviewing for adolescent substance use: A review of the literature. Addictive behaviors, 93, 249-259. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22958865/

Carroll, K. M., Ball, S. A., Nich, C., Martino, S., Frankforter, T. L., Farentinos, C., Kunkel, L. E., Mikulich‐Gilbertson, S. K., Morgenstern, J., Obert, J. L., Polcin, D., Snead, N., & Woody, G. (2006). Motivational Interviewing to Improve Treatment Engagement and Outcome in Individuals Seeking Treatment for Substance Abuse: A Multisite Effectiveness Study. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 81(3), 301-312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2005.08.002

Carroll, K. M., & Onken, L. S. (2020). Behavioral therapies for drug abuse. American Journal of Psychiatry, 177(6), 496-505. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3633201/

D'Amico, E. J., Parast, L., Shadel, W. G., Meredith, L. S., Seelam, R., & Stein, B. (2019). Brief motivational interviewing intervention to reduce alcohol and marijuana use for at-risk adolescents in primary care. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 87(3), 239-252. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30138016/

DiClemente, C. C., & Velasquez, M. M. (2020). Motivational interviewing and the stages of change. In W. R. Miller & S. Rollnick (Eds.), Motivational interviewing: Helping people change (pp. 201-216). Guilford Press. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/231081405_Motivational_Interviewing_and_the_Stages_of_Change

Hall, W., & Degenhardt, L. (2020). The adverse health effects of chronic cannabis use. Drug and Alcohol Review, 39(6), 524-531. https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.1506

Hayati, M., Namini, A. M., & Farrokhi, A. (2015). Efficacy of Combined Pharmacotherapy and Motivational Interviewing in Reducing Drug Addicts Craving. European Psychiatry, 30, 1051. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0924-9338(15)30827-0

Johnston, L. D., Miech, R. A. P. M. E., O'Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Schulenberg, J. E. (2022). Monitoring the Future national survey results on drug use 1975-2022: Overview, key findings on adolescent drug use. National Institute on Drug Abuse.

Kashefizadeh, M., Taher, M., Hosseinkhanzadeh, A., & Haj Aboutalebi, N. (2022). The effecacy of motivational interview on intentional self-regulation, distress tolerance and psychological flexibility in men with substance abuse disorder undergoing maintenance therapy. Journal-of-Psychological-Science, 21(117), 1815-1832. https://doi.org/10.52547/JPS.21.117.1815

Lundahl, B., Moleni, T., Burke, B. L., Butters, R., Tollefson, D., Butler, C., & Rollnick, S. (2018). Motivational interviewing in medical care settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Patient Education and Counseling, 93(2), 157-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2013.07.012

Madson, M. B., Loignon, A. C., & Lane, C. (2009). Training in motivational interviewing: A systematic review. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 36(1), 101-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2008.05.005

Mansouri, K., & Khodabakhshi-Koolaee, A. (2024). The Effectiveness of Motivational Interview (MI) on Aggression and High-risk Behaviors of Adolescent Girls. JPEN, 10(4), 41-49. https://civilica.com/doc/2029606/

Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2023). Motivational interviewing: Helping people change. Guilford Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2012-17300-000

Moyers, T. B., Martin, T. A., Manuel, J. K., Hendrickson, S. M. L., & Miller, W. R. (2005). Assessing Competence in the Use of Motivational Interviewing. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 28(1), 19-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2004.11.001

Muradian, A. A., Timerbulatova, M. F., & Timerbulatov, I. F. (2025). Non-Suicidal Self-Harm and Its Addictive Potential in Adolescents With Drug-Related Disorders. Vestnik Nevrologii Psihiatrii I Nejrohirurgii (Bulletin of Neurology Psychiatry and Neurosurgery)(4), 441-448. https://doi.org/10.33920/med-01-2504-02

Pagan, A. F. (2024). Motivational Interviewing for Young Adults With Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Pilot Feasibility Study. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/mt247

Parsafar, A. (2024). Investigating the Effectiveness of Motivational Interviewing on Social Anxiety and Academic Procrastination Among Students. Jayps, 5(3), 55-64. https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.jayps.5.3.6

Prochaska, J. O., & DiClemente, C. C. (2018). The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. American Journal of Health Promotion, 12(1), 38-48. https://doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-12.1.38

Rollnick, S., Miller, W. R., & Butler, C. C. (2019). Motivational interviewing in health care: Helping patients change behavior. Guilford Press. https://books.google.com/books/about/Motivational_Interviewing_in_Health_Care.html?id=MJ_LFr0sikQC

Sahibdel, H. (2022). The Effectiveness of Motivational Interviewing on Mental Health of Women with Substance-Dependent Partners. Quarterly Journal of Addiction Studies, 16(66), 328-311. https://doi.org/10.52547/etiadpajohi.16.66.311

Setiawan, A. (2022). The Effectiveness of Motivational Interviewing in Reducing Student Smartphone Addiction. Psikopedagogia Jurnal Bimbingan Dan Konseling, 11(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.12928/psikopedagogia.v11i1.22313

Zatzick, D., Russo, J., Lord, S. P., Varley, C., Wang, J., Berliner, L., Jurkovich, G., Whiteside, L. K., O’Connor, S., & Rivara, F. P. (2014). Collaborative Care Intervention Targeting Violence Risk Behaviors, Substance Use, and Posttraumatic Stress and Depressive Symptoms in Injured Adolescents: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Pediatrics, 168(6), 532-539. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.4784

Downloads

Published

2026-06-01

Submitted

2025-07-01

Revised

2025-11-12

Accepted

2025-11-19

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Dehghan , E. ., Mofakhami, F., Rabiee, S. ., Esmaeilzadeh , L. ., & Saadati , A. . (2026). The Effectiveness of a Multi-Session Motivational Interviewing (MI-Supportive) Intervention Combined with Digital Follow-Up (EMA/SMS) in Reducing Marijuana Use and Enhancing Motivation to Change among Clinical Adolescents: A Randomized Controlled Trial. International Journal of Education and Cognitive Sciences, 1-13. https://iase-ijeas.com/index.php/ecs/article/view/317